A reply to Uttal (2004)

A Problem in Avicennas View on the Origination of the Soul and a Reply to It

A discussion and review of Uttal ( 2001 ) The New Phrenology ∗

In his recent book, William R. Uttal suggests that the modern attempts to understand the localization of cognitive functions are misguided. According to Uttal, attempts to localize cognitive functions will fail because the to-be-localized cognitive processes simply do not exist. In this review, I will defend the position that the mind can be meaningfully divided into cognitive parts and, given ...

A Reply to Pickering

I felt I should reply to Andy Pickering’s short Response to my long Review of his book; I did not want to leave it uncontested in the literature.1 I will pick up a couple of points from his comments to indicate just what it is that he has failed to grasp about my Review. If these points are understood, then all else falls into place. Though Pickering writes that my critical remarks ‘form a disc...

A Reply to

A reply to

The Lazarus and Bewley [2005, LB05] evaluation of the Archer and Jacobson [2003, AJ03] methodology was designed to examine various sensitivities of a wind power parameterization that was applied globally to estimate 80 m wind power. Their original work has since been updated in a sequence of papers which has, in part, resulted in a reduction of their original power estimates due to some changes...